Dismissal of the appeal against the decision of the Appellate Court of Basel-City in the debt enforcement proceedings

Facts

The appellant [A.] filed several appeals against decisions of the Debt Collection Office of Basel-City. The lower supervisory authority did not enter into the first appeal, whereupon the appellant filed an appeal with the Appellate Court of the Canton of Basel-City. The Appellate Court dismissed the appeal, insofar as it entered into it.

Against the decision of the Appellate Court, the appellant filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court. She claimed that the decision violated various provisions, including from the Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Act, the Civil Code, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Obligations, the Accident Insurance Act, as well as the Constitution of Basel-City.

Considerations

The Federal Supreme Court did not enter into the appeal, as it was obviously not sufficiently reasoned. The appellant merely repeated her position, without addressing the considerations of the contested decision and comprehensibly explaining why this decision is supposed to violate the mentioned provisions.

The Federal Supreme Court stated that according to Art. 42 para. 2 of the Federal Supreme Court Act, the appeal brief must set forth in concise form the…