Facts
In debt enforcement proceedings of the condominium association [B.] against [A.] , [A.] was summoned by attachment notice dated April 8, 2019 to submit to the attachment execution. [A.] filed a complaint against this with the cantonal supervisory authorities, which, however, was unsuccessful. Thereupon, [A.] filed a civil law appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.
Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court concluded that the condominium association [B.] had effectively authorized the attorney Manuel Bucher to represent it in these debt enforcement proceedings. A written circular resolution of the condominium owners, in which only the appellant [A.] had not signed, was sufficient for this. The Federal Supreme Court saw no deficiency in this that would have called into question the attorney's power of representation.
Furthermore, the appellant complained that the lower court had imposed the procedural costs of CHF 300.- on him due to the frivolous conduct of the proceedings.…