Facts
The appellant [A.] suffered accidents to her cervical spine in 1997 and 2004 and underwent multiple surgeries. She subsequently filed several criminal complaints against the treating physician for various offenses, none of which resulted in a conviction. On April 20, 2017, [A.] filed a criminal complaint against a German product safety testing agency for suspected forgery of certificates dated July 1, 2003 and July 9, 2003 concerning the prosthesis model used on her. She also accused the Public Prosecutor's Office of Basel-Stadt of abuse of office and complicity, as it had tolerated the University Hospital of Basel withholding a large number of seized medical records in the proceedings against the treating physician. The submission of April 20, 2017 was forwarded to the Public Prosecutor's Office of Basel-Stadt. In a submission dated June 7/8, 2017, [A.] requested that the criminal complaint be forwarded to the Federal Prosecutor's Office, as it and not the Public Prosecutor's Office of Basel-Stadt was responsible for it. Furthermore, the Public Prosecutor's Office of Basel-Stadt was itself involved in the case. The submission of June 7/8, 2017 was forwarded to the Federal Prosecutor's Office together with the criminal complaint of April 20, 2017, which, however, denied its jurisdiction. By a non-consideration order dated July 10, 2017, the First Public Prosecutor did not consider [A.] 's criminal complaints, as the alleged offenses were clearly not fulfilled. [A.] appealed against the non-consideration of the proceedings, whereupon the Court of Appeal of Basel-Stadt did not enter into the appeal on January 15, 2018.Considerations
1. The lower court considers that
[A.] is entitled to appeal in criminal matters, as the contested decision may affect the assessment of her civil claims. However, in the proceedings before the Federal Court, she must demonstrate the reasons why the contested decision may affect which civil claims. 2. With regard to the criminal complaint against the German testing agency for forgery of documents, the lower court denies the appellant's standing to appeal. The offenses of document criminal law…