Facts
C. AG (the landlord) acquired two properties in Zurich on December 6, 2001. On March 20, 2013, A. and B. (the tenants) rented a 3 1/2-room maisonette apartment in one of these properties. The initial rent was set at CHF 3,900.- plus CHF 300.- in ancillary costs per month.
The tenants approached the conciliation authority with the request to declare the initial rent as abusive and to reduce it by CHF 1,100.-. The conciliation authority issued the authorization to file a lawsuit due to the lack of agreement.
The Zurich Rental Court dismissed the lawsuit. The Cantonal Court of Zurich confirmed the first-instance judgment. It justified this by stating that the tenants had to prove not only the housing shortage, but also a personal state of compulsion.
By way of a civil law appeal, the tenants requested the Federal Supreme Court to set aside the judgment of the Cantonal Court and to remand the case for a new assessment.
Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court upholds the appeal and remands the case to the lower court for a new assessment.
According to the interpretation of the Federal Supreme Court, Article 270 paragraph 1 lit. a CO provides for three alternative grounds that entitle the challenge of an initial rent as abusive: a personal or family emergency, the conditions on the local housing market, or a significant increase in the rent compared to the previous tenant.
For the challenge based on the…