Facts
The X. Life Insurance Company (hereinafter: X. Life) had developed two new products, "A." and "B.", which were financed with a single premium. The Federal Tax Administration informed X. Life that these products would be subject to closer examination to determine whether they could be considered redeemable capital life insurance policies for tax purposes.
The Federal Tax Administration concluded that the products "A." and "B." were to be considered as disguised investment transactions and that the conditions for tax privileges were not met. X. Life then requested that the Federal Tax Administration's ruling be revoked and that a new ruling be issued confirming the subordination of the products to Art. 20 para. 1 lit. a of the Federal Act on Direct Federal Taxation (DFTA).
The Federal Department of Finance did not admit the appeal, as the Federal Tax Administration had not issued a challengeable ruling. X. Life then filed an administrative court appeal with the Federal Court.
Considerations
The Federal Court dismissed the appeal. It stated that the Federal Tax Administration had not issued a challengeable ruling, but had merely communicated a legal opinion. Such a communication is not subject to appeal, as it does not establish any binding legal consequences.
The Federal Court further stated that the Federal Tax…