Facts
[X. AG] filed a complaint with the High Court of the Canton of Zug, the supervisory authority for debt collection and bankruptcy, against the payment order dated August 26, 2013, which [Y.] had obtained against it. The cantonal supervisory authority dismissed the complaint. Thereupon, [X. AG] appealed to the Federal Supreme Court and requested the revocation of the payment order.Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court upheld the complaint. It concluded that the designation "claim from employment contract and criminal proceedings, etc." in the present case does not meet the legal requirements for the description of the basis of the claim in the payment order. From the information on the payment order, [X. AG] could not…