Facts
F., born in 1982, a trained gardener, suffered a traffic accident on October 28, 2001, in which she sustained a concussion, thoracic contusion, a laceration-contusion wound on the chin, and a cervical spine (neck) distortion. Helsana Insurance initially provided medical treatment and paid a daily allowance. Due to persistent complaints, Helsana obtained a multidisciplinary medical expert opinion and a report from a neurologist. By objection decision dated September 26, 2008, Helsana discontinued the benefits as of March 31, 2008 and denied a claim for a disability pension and integrity compensation. F. filed a complaint against this decision.Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court decided that the overcomability practice according to BGE 136 V 279 and BGE 130 V 352 is not applicable to the claim for medical treatment and daily allowance under the Accident Insurance Act (UVG). The decisive factor for the case closure and the discontinuation of the temporary…