Facts
The insured person [A.] suffered a polytrauma with severe injuries, particularly a pelvic fracture, in a motorcycle accident in 1992. In 1994, the AIO (Suva) awarded him a 20% integrity indemnity. Due to relapses and subsequent illnesses, the AIO (Suva) granted the insured person a disability pension with a degree of disability of 32% as of 2020. The Insurance Court increased the relevant insured earnings for the pension calculation to CHF 101,747. [A.] and the AIO (Suva) filed appeals against this decision. [A.] requested, among other things, an increase in the integrity indemnity, while the AIO (Suva) completely rejected the pension claim.Considerations
The Federal Court set aside the decision of the lower instance and remanded the case to the Insurance Court for a reassessment of the integrity damage and the disability pension. It justified this as follows: - The lower instance had not conclusively clarified the issue of accident causality of the back complaints and other health impairments. Further medical clarifications are required, in particular a comprehensive…