Facts
The Federal Supreme Court (BGG) decided in a criminal case against [A.] , who was accused of breach of trust. The Public Prosecutor's Office III of the Canton of Zurich had convicted [A.] by penal order, whereupon both [A.] and the private plaintiff [B.] filed an objection. The District Court of Winterthur dismissed [A.] 's motion for non-entry due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. Against this order, [A.] filed a complaint with the High Court of the Canton of Zurich, which, however, did not enter into it. Thereupon, [A.] appealed to the Federal Supreme Court (BGG) in criminal matters.
Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court (BGG) stated that the issue of territorial jurisdiction should be clarified as early as possible in the proceedings. Since the District Court of Winterthur had already conclusively assessed the issue of jurisdiction with a separately appealable, reasoned order accompanied by instructions on legal remedies, the High Court should not have declared the appellant's legal remedy inadmissible due to the lack of an irreparable disadvantage, but should have examined the matter further.
For these reasons, the Federal…