Facts
On May 8, 2017, the High Court of the Canton of Aargau sentenced the appellant [X.] to a custodial sentence of four years for simple bodily injury, assault, commercial and partially organized theft, multiple criminal damage, and multiple trespass. The appellant then filed an appeal with the Federal Supreme Court.Considerations
1. Regarding the alleged procedural defects: - The appeal against the alleged lack of authority of the assistant public prosecutor to conduct the final interrogation was dismissed. The Federal Supreme Court saw no serious procedural error that would lead to the nullity or inadmissibility of the procedural acts. - The appeal against the lack of judicial signature of the first-instance trial minutes was also dismissed. The Federal Supreme Court saw the defect as merely an accidental failure to sign by the presiding judge, which could be remedied by a written confirmation of the correctness of the minutes. - The appeal against the alleged incorrect course of the appeal hearing was dismissed. The Federal Supreme Court saw no serious procedural error that would require a remand to safeguard the parties' rights. 2. Regarding the substantive legal objections: - The appeal against a violation of the principle of indictment was dismissed. The Federal Supreme Court considered the indictment charge to be sufficiently precisely described. - The appeal against the assumption of assault instead of brawl was also dismissed. The Federal Supreme…