Facts
On 10 November 2012, the appellant [X.] collided with his passenger car in a private parking lot in [B.] with the parked vehicle of [C.] . Although the injured party requested him to wait for the police, [X.] left the accident site without providing her with his name and address. Later, he refused to comply with the police's request to return to the accident site for a breath alcohol test. Furthermore, on 11 July 2013, [X.] sold two airsoft guns to a Croatian national, although she was not entitled to possess them.Considerations
The Federal Court upholds the conviction of the Higher Court for dereliction of duty after an accident. [X.] failed to immediately and personally provide the injured party with his name and address, as required by Art. 51 para. 3 RTA. The conviction for obstruction of measures to determine incapacity to drive is also in accordance with federal law. [X.] clearly and unambiguously resisted the police's request to return…