Facts
The appellant [X.] , the son of the deceased property owner [Y.] , filed an appeal against the decision of the Meggen Municipal Council, which obliged the property owner to cease construction work and restore the lawful state. The Administrative Court of the Canton of Lucerne dismissed the appeal. The FSCA took up the appeal insofar as it was directed against the judgment of the Administrative Court. It dismissed the appeal, as the appellant had not sufficiently substantiated the allegations of violation of federal law. The FSCA set a new deadline for the restoration of the lawful state by the end of August 2010.Considerations
The FSCA stated that the appellant had not sufficiently substantiated his appeal and had not adequately addressed the findings of the lower instance. The factual findings of the lower instance were not arbitrary, as they were based on the photographs in the files and the minutes of the on-site inspection…