Facts
[S.] , born in 1950, was employed as a project manager at [A. AG] since 25 October 1999 and was thus compulsorily insured against accidents with Winterthur-Versicherungen, now AXA Versicherungen AG (AXA). On 12 January 2001, he fell while skiing and on 17 June 2001, he suffered a rupture of the right Achilles tendon. AXA provided the statutory benefits (medical treatment and daily allowance) for both accidents. By decree dated 2 March 2006, AXA informed the insured of the following: Sec. 6.1: The entitlement to daily allowance expires upon regaining full capacity to work, at the latest as of May 2005. Sec. 6.2: Due to the full capacity to work in the previous occupation as a project manager, the entitlement to an invalidity pension is forfeited. Sec. 6.3: The costs of medical treatment will be covered until 31 January 2006. Any further claims from 1 February 2006 onwards are to be examined through the health insurance. The insured filed an appeal against this decree. The Administrative Court of the Canton of Thurgau dismissed the appeal. The present appeal of the insured to the Federal Supreme Court is directed against this decision.Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. It concluded that AXA rightly discontinued the benefits: - Based on the expert opinion of the medical centre [M.] dated 14 September 2004 and the report by Dr. med. [H.] dated 10 July 2007, it was established with a high probability that the lumbar and cervical pain syndrome as well as the impingement symptoms of the right shoulder of the insured were not naturally causally related to the accidents of 12 January and 17 June 2001 at the time of the discontinuation of benefits.…