Facts
The [X. AG] , the owner of Moosbachweg in Zug, filed an administrative court appeal against a parking prohibition on Moosbachweg imposed by the Zug City Council. The City Council had ordered the parking prohibition, as the regular parking of vehicles on Moosbachweg significantly impeded the passage and access for emergency vehicles. The cantonal instances had dismissed the appeal of the [X. AG] .Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court dismissed the administrative court appeal of the [X. AG] . It stated that the Moosbachweg, although owned by the [X. AG] , is to be qualified as a public traffic area due to a public pedestrian and vehicular right of way granted to the municipality of Zug. Therefore, the competent state authorities are entitled to order functional traffic restrictions within the meaning of Art. 3 para. 4 of the RTA on this road section.
The Federal Supreme Court considered the parking prohibition ordered by the City Council as a permissible measure, as it serves to ensure access for fire brigade and waste disposal vehicles, and is thus in the public interest. The order…