Facts
This case concerns the judicial revocation of the administrator of a condominium association (Art. 712r para. 2 CC). The question is whether there were valid grounds for the judicial revocation of the administrator by the condominium association.
The cantonal court held that the complaints against the administrator did not constitute valid grounds for revocation. The claimant appealed this decision, putting forward several arguments.
Considerations
The Federal Court considers that the fact that the administrator repeatedly prepared incorrect heating and hot water bills, despite repeated criticism from the condominium owners, constitutes valid grounds for judicial revocation. Although some isolated shortcomings, such as the preparation of an incomplete agenda or the attempt to hold a vote without prior discussion, do not alone justify…