Facts
In this case, it was about a complaint by [A. SA] against a presidential decree of the High Court of the Canton of Zug, by which the High Court had not entered into the company's complaint against the granting of the definitive enforcement of judgment for outstanding Federal Direct Taxes.
[A. SA] had requested the Federal Supreme Court that its applications be handled by no member of the Federal Supreme Court and no court clerk whose salary is paid by more than 50% by the Confederation. It also demanded that no members of the Federal Supreme Court and no court clerks who are Freemasons, Jesuits or members of another non-governmental association be admitted.
The Federal Supreme Court did not enter into this request for recusal. It stated that the appellant could not be found to have any objection indicating a violation of the statutory incompatibility rules. Its request to generally exclude Federal Judges and Federal Judges as well as court clerks who receive more than 50% of their salary from the Confederation or belong to certain non-governmental organizations from participating was not admissible.
Considerations
On the merits, the Federal Supreme Court did not enter into the appeal. It stated that the appellant did not dispute the existence of a legally binding tax assessment and even admitted to having missed an objection to it. Its…