Facts
The Federal Supreme Court has decided on the appeal of [A.] and [B.] against the sale of participations of [D. AG] in liquidation by the bankruptcy office. [A.] claimed to be the sole shareholder of [D. AG] in liquidation, and [B.] was the sole member of the board of directors of the company. The cantonal court had denied both the right to appeal. The Federal Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, insofar as it could be entered upon. It concluded that [A.] had not sufficiently proven his position as a shareholder and creditor of [D. AG] in liquidation and therefore had no right to appeal. [B.] also could not demonstrate that he had filed the appeal on behalf of [D. AG] in liquidation and not in his own name. Thus, he also lacked the right to appeal. Regarding the nullity of the sale of the participations by the bankruptcy office, the Federal Supreme Court concluded that the appellants could not present any grounds for nullity. The cantonal court had sufficiently justified the rejection of the appellants' allegation that it was a distress sale.Considerations
1. The appellants had no right to appeal: - [A.] could not prove his position as a shareholder and creditor of [D. AG] in liquidation, which is why he was denied the right to appeal. - [B.] as the member of the board of directors of [D. AG] in liquidation generally had the possibility to file an appeal on behalf of the company.…