Facts
M. registered with the IV Office of Glarus in April 2011 due to depression and chronic pain. The IV Office ordered a medical assessment by the Center A. M. rejected this assessment center, as it was "simply unreasonable" to be assessed there based on complaints from other insured persons. However, the IV Office maintained the assessment by the Center A.
M. filed a complaint with the Administrative Court of the Canton of Glarus, which was dismissed. Subsequently, M. filed an appeal in public law matters with the Federal Supreme Court.
Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court did not enter into the appeal. It stated that cantonal decisions and judgments of the Federal Administrative Court on appeals against decisions of the IV Offices regarding the procurement of medical expert opinions are generally not appealable to the Federal Supreme Court, unless grounds for recusal have been assessed.
The formal rejection of an expert witness cannot generally be justified solely by the structural circumstances as discussed in BGE 137 V 210. The appellant's…