Facts
B. (born 1962) applied to the Disability Insurance on 17/27 September 2002 for a pension due to the residual effects of a motorcycle accident she suffered as a passenger on 4 August 1996. After obtaining a multidisciplinary expert opinion from MEDAS X. on 24 May 2004, the IV-Stelle Schwyz (Disability Insurance Office Schwyz) decided on 7 March 2005 to award her a half disability pension with effect from 1 September 2001, based on a degree of disability of 57%. The objection filed against this was rejected by the administration, which determined a degree of disability of around 59%. The Administrative Court of the Canton of Schwyz partially upheld the appeal and awarded B. a full disability pension for the period from 1 December 2001 to 30 April 2004, and from 1 May 2004 a three-quarter disability pension based on a degree of disability of 61.7%.Considerations
The Federal Social Insurance Court examines whether the lower court violated federal law, established the legally relevant facts obviously incorrectly, incompletely or in violation of essential procedural provisions.
The cantonal court has correctly presented the relevant statutory provisions and case law principles for assessing the pension entitlement. The finding of a 50% work capacity in adapted alternative activities is a question of fact and is therefore generally binding for the Federal Social Insurance Court.
However, the question of whether the employment relationship with the company O. AG and the income earned there…