Facts
The Jury Court of the Canton of Zurich sentenced [X.] on 2 September 2008 to 15 3/4 years' imprisonment for intentional homicide, multiple endangerment of life, offences against the Weapons Act and serious violation of traffic regulations. The FSCA dismissed his appeal in criminal matters. [X.] has been in custody since 10 May 2006, the regular end of the sentence is 11 September 2019. With a view to the two-thirds deadline on 11 June 2014, the Office of Corrections commissioned Dr. med. [A.] to conduct an assessment. [X.] had refused to cooperate. On 15 April 2014, the Office rejected the conditional release. In the appeal proceedings, the Directorate of Justice and Home Affairs, the Administrative Court and the FSCA dismissed the appeals. In the context of the annual review, the Office again rejected the conditional release on 15 June 2015 and 2 June 2016. [X.] filed a complaint and submitted a private expert opinion by PD Dr. med. [B.] dated 13 December 2016. The Administrative Court dismissed the complaint on 21 December 2016.Considerations
The FSCA notes that the decision on the conditional release of the appellant depends on whether a favourable prognosis can be made for him within the meaning of Art. 86 para. 1 SCC. Conditional release represents the fourth and final stage of the execution of the sentence and is the rule, from which there may only be deviations for good reasons. The FSCA concludes that the appellant's impeccable behaviour in the execution of the sentence…