Dismissal of the appeal against precautionary restraining orders over properties

Facts

[A. AG] (appellant) filed an appeal against precautionary restraining orders that the District Court [U.] had issued at the request of [B.B.] (respondent) over properties of [A. AG] . The Cantonal Court of St. Gallen lifted the restraining orders over two out of ten properties, but dismissed the appeal in all other respects. [A. AG] subsequently filed a civil law appeal with the Federal Supreme Court. It alleged a violation of the right to be heard and the guarantee of property rights.

Considerations

The Federal Supreme Court dismissed the appeal: - There is no violation of the right to be heard. The Cantonal Court rightly assumed that the procedural defect in the appeal proceedings was remedied, as the appellant had the opportunity to comprehensively comment on the submission of the respondent. - The allegation of a violation of the guarantee of property rights is not sufficiently substantiated, as the appellant does not explain in what respect the guarantee of property rights should have…