Facts
The appellant [X.] filed an appeal against the decision of the High Court of the Canton of Zurich dated 9 June 2011, by which it had not entered into his appeal against the decision of the District Court of Zurich dated 30 March 2011. The District Court had previously dismissed the appellant's appeal against the edictual service of the payment orders in two debt collection proceedings, as well as his request for restoration of the time limits for objection. The Federal Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of [X.] , insofar as it was admissible. It concluded that the appeal against the decision of the District Court regarding the edictual service was filed too late, as it did not constitute a debt collection action within the meaning of Art. 56 DEBA, for which the debt collection holidays and the extension of the time limit under Art. 63 DEBA would have applied. The dismissal of the request for restoration of the time limits for objection by the District Court also did not constitute a debt collection action, so that the appeal filed against it with the High Court was also too late.Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court stated that decisions of the supervisory authorities, which merely pronounce on the merits of an appeal without prescribing a specific debt collection action to the enforcement…