Facts
The appellant [X.] was found guilty by penal order of 10 September 2008 of indecency and driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and was sentenced to an unconditional prison term of 12 months. The enforcement of the prison sentence was suspended in favor of outpatient treatment (Art. 63 SCC).
The Penal Enforcement and Measures Court of the Canton of Valais revoked the outpatient treatment with a decision of 23 March 2011 and ordered the enforcement of the 12-month prison sentence. An appeal filed by [X.] against this decision was dismissed by the Cantonal Court of Valais with a ruling of 30 May 2011.
[X.] has filed a criminal appeal and requests that the ruling of the Cantonal Court of Valais and the decision of the Penal Enforcement and Measures Court of the Canton of Valais be revoked.
Considerations
The appellant accuses the lower court of arbitrary and erroneous establishment of the facts. The lower court has incompleteley gathered evidence and arbitrarily evaluated it.
The lower court considers the continuation of the outpatient measure to be hopeless, without however obtaining the necessary reports from the treating therapists. The lower court does not examine possible causes of the setbacks or the course and results of the outpatient measure.
The aforementioned relapses of the appellant can therefore not be used as the…