Facts
The association [X.] files a complaint with the Federal Court against the decision of the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Canton of Zurich of 29 September 2010. The Public Prosecutor's Office See/Oberland of the Canton of Zurich is conducting two proceedings concerning the unusual deaths of [A.Y.] and her daughter [B.Y.] , both German nationals and last resident in Germany. [A.Y.] and [B.Y.] died on 24 June 2010 in the premises of the association [X.] . The Public Prosecutor's Office See/Oberland assumes a joint suicide accompanied by employees of the association [X.] .
Prior to their suicide, [A.Y.] and [B.Y.] , according to the written records they left behind, paid a "special membership fee" to the association [X.] . By letter of 26 July 2010, the Public Prosecutor's Office See/Oberland requested the association [X.] to provide information on the nature, purpose, and legal basis of the apparently required special membership fee and to submit all evidence showing which funds had been transferred to the association [X.] in these two cases (suicide of [A.Y.] and [B.Y.] ).
Against this order, the association [X.] and - in its own name - its Secretary General [Z.] filed an appeal with the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Canton of Zurich on 9 August 2010 and requested the cancellation of the order. By decision of 29 September 2010, the latter did not consider the appeal by [Z.] and dismissed the appeal of the association [X.] , insofar as it was considered.
Considerations
The Federal Court must examine whether the complaint is admissible. The complaint is directed against an interlocutory decision that does not conclude the criminal proceedings. According to Art. 93 para. 1 FSCA, a complaint to the Federal Court is admissible against preliminary and interlocutory decisions that do not relate to jurisdiction or recusal, if they can cause irreparable harm.
The request for disclosure by the Public Prosecutor's Office constitutes a request for voluntary…