Facts
- [X.] (Appellant) and [Y.] (Respondent) were married since 1997 and have a common daughter. - The Higher Court of the Canton of Solothurn regulated in its judgment of 11 December 2008 the consequences of the divorce, in particular the right of access, the child welfare guardianship, the maintenance and the matrimonial property settlement. - [X.] appealed parts of this judgment to the Federal Supreme Court.Considerations
- The Federal Supreme Court partially upholds the appeal, insofar as it is admissible. - It annuls Sections 6.2 and 6.4 of the Higher Court's judgment concerning the imputation of a hypothetical earned income for [X.] and remands the case on this point to the lower instance. - In all other respects, the Federal Supreme Court dismisses the appeal. In particular, it confirms the regulation of the right of access, the child welfare…