Facts
- [K.] (Appellant) is a niece of the testator [E.] and his statutory heir. She filed a lawsuit together with her sister and her father against [B.] (Respondent) and [W.] (Respondent). - [E.] entered into a partnership with [B.] and made several testamentary dispositions in which he appointed [B.] as his heir and [W.] as the executor of his will. - [K.] claimed the unworthiness of [B.] to inherit and the invalidity of the wills. - The District Court, the High Court, and the Court of Cassation dismissed [K.] 's claim and confirmed the validity of the wills and the appointment of [B.] as the heir.Considerations
- Central to the assessment was the testator's capacity to make a will according to Art. 467 CC. The courts concluded that the testator, despite his difficult life situation and dependence on [B.] , was able to assert himself against her influence and form his own will. The Appellant…