Facts
The applicant [X.] , represented by [Y.] , filed a request for revision against the judgment of the FSCA of 12 January 2007. In this judgment, the FSCA had accepted the administrative court appeal of [X.] against the judgment of the GLA of Basel-Landschaft of 13 September 2006 concerning cantonal education grants as a constitutional complaint and had not entered into it in the simplified procedure under Art. 36a FJA. The FSCA had also rejected the request of [X.] for legal aid and ordered him to pay the procedural costs of CHF 1'200.
Considerations
The FSCA did not enter into the request for recusal of [X.] against the FSCA judges and the court clerk involved in the previous proceedings, as it was considered an abuse of rights. The reasoning that the court members had made use of the possibility in previous proceedings not to enter into a legal remedy due to querulous or abusive litigation was not sufficient for this.
With regard to the request for revision, the FSCA concluded that neither the ground for revision of Art. 121 lit. d FSCA (non-consideration of significant facts) nor any other ground for revision was present. The FSCA's approach of accepting [X.] 's legal remedy as a constitutional complaint and deciding on it in the simplified procedure was based on the…