Facts
[J.], born in 1975, registered with the IV (Disability Insurance) in November 2006 and applied for a pension. The IV-Stelle Basel-Landschaft (Disability Insurance Office of Basel-Landschaft) rejected the claim for integration measures and a pension, as the health problems already existed at the time of entry into Switzerland in 2002. The Kantonsgericht Basel-Landschaft (Cantonal Court of Basel-Landschaft) confirmed this decision on 17 October 2008, which remained unchallenged. In February 2009, [J.] registered with the IV again for the receipt of benefits and reported a deterioration of her health condition. The IV-Stelle did not enter into the claim for benefits. However, the Kantonsgericht Basel-Landschaft upheld J.'s appeal. The IV-Stelle then filed an appeal in public law matters with the BGG (Federal Supreme Court).Considerations
The BGG stated that the legal force of decisions on long-term benefits in social insurance is generally unlimited in time. This also applies to the eligibility requirements, such as the contribution under Art. 6 para. 2 IVG. These requirements cannot therefore be called into question at the beginning of each new benefit period, subject to a revision or reconsideration of the legally binding decision. In the…