Facts
The appellant [A.] was arrested by the police on March 28, 2023 and placed in pretrial detention by the Compulsory Measures Court of the Canton of Lucerne. The Cantonal Court of Lucerne dismissed his appeal against the detention order and his request for legal aid. [A.] then applied to the Federal Supreme Court to set aside the decision of the Cantonal Court and to release him from custody immediately. He also requested the granting of legal aid and assignment of counsel for the federal court proceedings. The Public Prosecutor's Office of Emmen is conducting a criminal investigation against [A.] on suspicion of fraud and violations of the Weapons Act. He is accused, together with [B.] , of attempting to defraud an elderly couple of 50,000 francs in a "police trap". [A.] is alleged to have acted as the driver for [B.] .Considerations
1. The Federal Supreme Court reviewed the appeal freely, as it concerns an appeal against a criminal procedural coercive measure that affects the right to personal freedom. 2. The Federal Supreme Court concluded that the appellant's right to be heard in the cantonal detention proceedings was not violated. The prosecuting authorities were not obliged to present all preliminary investigation results, such as statements from co-accused, in the detention proceedings. A one-sided selection of evidence that does not objectively reflect the preliminary evidentiary result is not present. 3. Regarding the urgent suspicion of an offense pursuant to Art. 221 para. 1 CrimPC, the Federal Supreme Court concluded that the lower court rightly…