Facts
[A.A.] , born in 1964, and [B.A.] , born in 1965, both of Finnish nationality, were married on August 5, 1995 in Helsinki, without concluding a marriage contract. Three children, now of legal age, were born of their union. The [A.] family moved to Geneva in 2004. [B.A.] has been living in England with the children since 2012. [A.A.] first remained in Geneva in the family villa before moving to London in 2017. On April 18, 2013, the parties filed a joint divorce petition, requesting the approval of a divorce settlement signed on November 5 and 13, 2012. [B.A.] subsequently indicated that she intended to invalidate this settlement. On October 18, 2013, she filed a unilateral divorce petition, concluding that the court should liquidate the matrimonial regime. By judgment of August 17, 2020, the Court of First Instance in particular ordered [A.A.] to pay [B.A.] CHF 6,706,821 with interest at 5% per annum from the date the judgment became enforceable, as part of the liquidation of the matrimonial regime. [B.A.] appealed against this judgment, concluding that [A.A.] should be ordered to pay her CHF 124,521,191.50, with interest at 5% per annum from the date of the divorce judgment, as part of the liquidation of the matrimonial regime. By judgment of August 31, 2021, the Court of Justice ordered [A.A.] to pay [B.A.] CHF 115,871,422 with interest at 5% per annum from August 17, 2020 as part of the liquidation of the matrimonial regime.Considerations
The Federal Tribunal partially upheld [A.A.] 's appeal and amended the contested judgment, ordering [A.A.] to pay [B.A.] CHF 115,871,422 with interest at 5% per annum from August 31, 2021 as part of the liquidation of the matrimonial regime. For the remainder, the appeal was dismissed. The Court of Justice held that the conditions of Art. 85 para. 2 CPC were met, so that [B.A.] did not have to quantify her conclusions on the liquidation of the matrimonial…