Facts
On July 5, 2018, the Public Prosecutor's Office of Solothurn did not take up the proceedings initiated by [A.] against unknown persons for disruption of public traffic and railway traffic (Art. 237 and Art. 238 of the Swiss Criminal Code) through the operation of the shooting range [B.] . The High Court of the Canton of Solothurn did not enter into the complaint filed by [A.] against this on September 20, 2018. The Federal Court dismissed his complaint on January 17, 2019, insofar as it entered into it.
[A.] now requests a revision of the judgment of the Federal Court. He argues that the Federal Court has accidentally failed to take into account significant facts in the files, as it "obviously did not interpret the danger zones as probability zones" and merely qualified all shooting ranges in front of the shooting range as "objectively possible".
Considerations
The Federal Court considers the request for revision to be unfounded. The objection of the applicant obviously does not concern the factual basis of the criticized judgment, but the legal view represented by the Federal Court regarding the interpretation of the danger zones. This does not constitute a ground for revision.
The Federal Court states that in its previous judgment of January 17, 2019, it had explicitly assumed zones with increased risk. However, it had denied a concrete risk to…