Facts
[A.] (Appellant) was involved in two traffic accidents on 7 March 2019. He sustained injuries and asserted claims for damages and satisfaction against the driver [D.C.] (Respondent 3), the owner [C.C.] (Respondent 2), and the motor vehicle liability insurance company [B. AG] (Respondent 1). The District Court and the High Court of the Canton of Aargau dismissed the claim. The Federal Supreme Court upheld the decision of the lower courts.Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court stated that the lower court had rightly denied the natural causal link between the accidents and the appellant's alleged health impairments. While it was conceivable that both accidents were causally responsible for the complaints, the appellant was unable to provide proof of this. The lower court had detailed the reasoning for this and convincingly demonstrated that the attribution of the complaints to one of the two accidents was not reliably possible. This lack of proof of the natural causal link led to…