Facts
The complainant, [A.] , filed a criminal complaint against [X.] on 17 November 2015 for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent deprivation of property, and money laundering, and filed a criminal complaint. The Basel-Stadt public prosecutor's office did not initiate proceedings with a decision of 19 August 2016. The appeal against this decision was dismissed by the Appellationsgericht of the canton of Basel-Stadt on 28 April 2017. The complainant requests that the decision of the Appellationsgericht be set aside and the matter be referred back to it for reconsideration.
The complainant accuses her former legal representative [X.] of not protecting her rights as a victim in a criminal proceedings conducted by the Solothurn public prosecutor's office against [Y.] and [Z.] . The economic crimes division of the Basel-Stadt public prosecutor's office conducted investigative measures by questioning the complainant and the accused person. These interrogations were referred to as police interrogations.
Considerations
The Federal Court examines whether the complainant is entitled to file a complaint in criminal matters. The complainant argues that the contested decision may affect her civil claims, but does not explain why the contested decision may affect which civil claim. The Federal Court finds that the complainant is not entitled to file a complaint in the matter itself.
The complainant further complains of a violation of her right to be heard, as she was never given the opportunity to participate in the taking of evidence. The…