Facts
The spouses [A.C.] and [B.C.] are involved in a matrimonial protection proceedings before the courts of the Canton of Basel-Landschaft. On 2 October 2014, the Civil District Court issued a decision ordering matrimonial protection measures and granting both parties legal aid. On 22 October 2014, the Civil District Court sent the corrected decision ("rectification") to the parties. With an appeal dated 31 October 2014, the wife [A.C.] filed an appeal with the Cantonal Court of Basel-Landschaft. According to the shipping records, the appeal was posted at the post office on 3 November 2014. The Cantonal Court dismissed the wife's request for restoration of the appeal deadline and subsequently did not enter into the late-filed appeal. The wife [A.C.] has filed a complaint against these decisions of the Cantonal Court dated 16 December 2014 and 22 December 2014 with the Federal Supreme Court.Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court dismisses the complaint. It considers it not arbitrary that the Cantonal Court treated the wife as being in default and rejected her request for restoration of the appeal deadline. The Cantonal Court did not consider the facts presented by the wife in support of her request for restoration to be credible. This assessment does not prove to be unconstitutional from…