Facts
The appellant [X.] filed an appeal with the High Court of the Canton of Thurgau against various investigative measures taken by the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Canton of Thurgau. The High Court dismissed the appeal in its decision of May 5, 2011, insofar as it entered into the matter and partially struck out the appeal as having become moot.
[X.] appealed the decision of the High Court to the FSCA on June 12, 2011. He requested the "review and correction" of the contested decision.
Considerations
The FSCA dismissed the appeal, insofar as it could enter into the matter. It stated that the appellant had not presented the prerequisites for a decision on the merits of an appeal against the interim decision. In particular, it was not apparent that he was threatened with an irreparable legal disadvantage by the decision.
Insofar as the appellant complained that the minutes of the confrontation interview of March 14, 2011 were recorded incorrectly or incompletely in terms of content, an impending irreparable legal disadvantage could not be ruled out from the outset. However, the FSCA stated that the appellant had not shown which passages…