Facts

The applicant [X.] filed a request for revision with the Federal Court against the judgment 2C_719/2008 of 28 October 2008, in which the Federal Court had not entered into his appeal in public law matters. [X.] requested that the judgment 2C_719/2008 and the entire previous instance proceedings be set aside. He also filed a motion for recusal against Federal Judge Merkli and Court Clerk Feller.

Considerations

The Federal Court did not enter into either the motion for recusal or the request for revision. For the motion for recusal, there was a lack of adequate justification, as the mere fact that the judgment had gone against the applicant did not constitute a ground for recusal. The information from the Internet cited by the applicant, as well as a previous judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, were also irrelevant for the motion for recusal.

With regard to the request for revision, the applicant did not demonstrate in what way a ground for revision within the…