Facts
The complainant [X.] , a Kosovo citizen, married a Swiss citizen on June 18, 2008, and received a residence permit, which was last extended until June 17, 2011. After the spouses separated in August/September 2010, the Office for Work and Migration Uri revoked the complainant's residence permit on January 3, 2011. The complainant unsuccessfully appealed to the High Court of the Canton of Uri and applied to the FSCA to overturn the decision of May 6, 2011, and to refrain from revoking his residence permit.
The parties to the proceedings are the complainant [X.] , represented by lawyer Franz Hollinger, and the Office for Work and Migration Uri. The proceedings concern the revocation of the complainant's residence permit.
Considerations
The FSCA ruled that the complainant has no right to the issuance or extension of his residence permit, as the marital community with his Swiss wife has been definitively dissolved and the marriage did not last for at least three years. The complainant cannot invoke Art. 50 para. 1 lit. a AuG, as the marital community did not have the required duration.
The court also examined whether a hardship case pursuant to Art. 50 para. 1 lit. b AuG exists, which would allow the permit claim to continue. However, it came to the conclusion that there are no important personal reasons that make a further stay in Switzerland necessary. The personal, professional, and family reintegration of the complainant in his home country is not strongly endangered, and there is no personal, post-marital hardship…