Facts
Parties:
- Appellant: [A.] , represented by attorney Kaspar Gehring
- Respondent: Swiss Accident Insurance Agency (Suva)
Facts:
- [A.] was employed as a chauffeur at [B. GmbH] and insured with the Suva.
- On September 13, 2018, he suffered a nail puncture injury to his left hand and underwent multiple surgeries.
- The Suva covered the medical treatment and daily allowance.
- On August 31, 2019, [B. GmbH] terminated the employment contract with [A.] effective October 31, 2019.
- By letter dated September 19, 2019, the Suva informed [A.] that the final state of health had been reached and that he would be considered fully employable and fit for placement as of November 1, 2019.
- The Suva denied a claim for a pension and a claim for an integrity compensation.
- The Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich partially upheld the appeal of [A.] and overturned the Suva's objection decision regarding the integrity compensation.
- [A.] filed an appeal in public law matters with the Federal Supreme Court.
Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court examines the appeal in public law matters and applies the law ex officio. It is not bound by the previous instance's findings of fact relevant to the law.
Regarding the integrity compensation, this is an interlocutory decision that does not cause a disadvantage within the meaning of Art. 93 para. 1 lit. a FSCA. Therefore, the appeal cannot be admitted insofar as an integrity compensation is requested.
The previous instance correctly presented the decisive legal bases and the case law concerning disability, claims for medical treatment, daily allowance, and disability pension as well as the case closure.
The previous instance correctly recognized that the assessment of Dr. med. [C.] of September 12, 2019, according to which the medical final state had been reached at that time, was congruent with the findings of the treating physicians.
The previous instance confirmed the plausibility of the assessment of Dr. med. [C.] …