Facts
The [X. AG] was sued by the Public Employment Agency of the Canton of Aargau with payment order No. xxx of the debt collection office [A.] of June 30, 2010, for a claim in the amount of CHF 20,354.15 for subrogated wage claims after payment of insolvency compensation. The [X. AG] did not lodge an appeal. On February 11, 2011, the debt collection office served the [X. AG] with a notice of bankruptcy. On March 15, 2011, the Employment Agency filed a petition for bankruptcy with the District Court of Brugg. By decision of December 14, 2011, the Presidium of the Court of Brugg opened bankruptcy proceedings against the [X. AG] .
Against the decision of the bankruptcy judge, the [X. AG] lodged an appeal and requested the cancellation of the opening of bankruptcy proceedings. The High Court of the Canton of Aargau dismissed the appeal by decision of March 1, 2012. The [X. AG] lodged an appeal in civil matters on April 10, 2012, and requests the cancellation of the high court's decision and the cancellation of the opening of bankruptcy proceedings.
Considerations
The Federal Court has dealt with the appeal in civil matters against the decision of the High Court of the Canton of Aargau of March 1, 2012. The appellant complains of a violation of federal law, in particular the service of the notice of bankruptcy proceedings and the bankruptcy decree to the address of the board of directors [Y.] .
The Federal Court has found that the service of the notice of bankruptcy proceedings to [Y.] , the authorized member of the board of directors of the appellant, was legally effective. Service can be made to any authorized representative, and the private address may also be used. The appellant has not alleged that the legal opinion that service to the private address of…