Facts
The Federal Supreme Court had rendered a judgment on June 20, 2007, in which it dismissed the constitutional complaint of [X.] against the judgment of the Higher Court of the Canton of Solothurn of October 19, 2006. [X.] had appealed against the determination of the maintenance contribution to his wife [Y.] . With a request for revision of July 18, 2007, [X.] demanded the annulment of the judgment of June 20, 2007, and a new decision on his constitutional complaint.
The parties are [X.] , the applicant, and [Y.] , the respondent. The proceedings concern the revision of the federal court judgment 5P.485/2006 of June 20, 2007. The applicant requests the annulment of the judgment and a new decision on his constitutional complaint.
Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court examined the request for revision and came to the conclusion that the request does not meet the statutory requirements. The applicant had invoked Art. 121 lit. d FSCA and claimed that the Federal Supreme Court had based its decision on incorrect assumptions and had not considered or had misinterpreted facts established in the records.
However, the Federal Supreme Court found that the applicant had not sufficiently substantiated his objections. In particular, he had not demonstrated that the Federal Supreme Court had inadvertently failed to consider significant facts established in the records.…