Facts
The Federal Supreme Court had rendered a judgment on May 20, 2008, in an accident insurance case (8C_270/2008). [G.] filed a revision petition against this judgment on June 17, 2008. The Swiss Accident Insurance Fund (SUVA) was the respondent. The revision petition was handled by the I. social law division of the Federal Supreme Court under President Judge Ursprung.
The parties were [G.] as the petitioner and the Swiss Accident Insurance Fund (SUVA) as the respondent. The revision petition referred to the judgment of the Federal Supreme Court of May 20, 2008, in the case 8C_270/2008.
Considerations
The Federal Supreme Court examined whether the revision petition met the formal requirements. According to Art. 42 Abs. 1 FSCA, an appeal must contain the requests and their justification with indication of the means of proof. The justification must briefly explain how the contested act violates the law.
The Federal Supreme Court found that the revision petition did not meet these requirements. In particular, none of the statutory grounds for revision (Art. 121-123 FSCA) was presented with indication of the means of proof and it was not explained how, based on these grounds, the disposition of the final judgment of May 20, 2008, should be amended.
Therefore, the Federal Supreme Court recognized that the revision petition was obviously inadmissible and decided not to consider it. No…