Facts
The complainant [X.] has lodged a complaint in civil matters against the decision of the High Court of the Canton of Bern, Supervisory Authority in Bankruptcy and Debt Collection Matters, of 13 January 2010. The decision concerns the appointment of [Z. GmbH] to update the market value assessment of properties in the context of a debt collection procedure on mortgage realization.
The complainant claims that the managing director of [Z. GmbH] , [Z.] , is biased because he has business contacts with [Y.] , President and Director of [Y. AG] , and that the latter participated in the auction of 22 January 2009. The complainant demands the revocation of the appraisal order and the appointment of an independent and unbiased expert.
The Debt Collection Office has forwarded the complainant's submission to the High Court, which has dismissed the complaint. The High Court has found that the question of personal connections between [Z.] and [Y.] is not relevant to the decision and therefore does not need to be further clarified.
Considerations
The Federal Court has dismissed the complaint in civil matters, insofar as it can be considered. The Court has found that the complaint does not meet the requirements for grounds and that the complainant's submissions are not relevant to the decision.
The Court has further found that the Supervisory Authority did not further investigate the question of [Z.] 's bias, as this was not relevant to the decision. The Court…