Facts
The proceedings concern the special support of [A.] 's son at a private school. [A.] had filed a complaint in public law matters against a decision not to proceed by the President of the Cantonal Court of Basel-Landschaft of 6 April 2022. The Federal Court had upheld this complaint with a judgment of 29 November 2022 and lifted the decision not to proceed.
The Cantonal Court of Basel-Landschaft then set a deadline for [A.] to pay the advance payment of costs, should he persist in his complaint. [A.] paid the advance payment of costs and then filed a complaint in public law matters with the Federal Court, seeking the lifting of the advance payment of costs. The Federal Court did not proceed with the motion with judgment 2C_95/2023 of 16 February 2023 due to a lack of current legal protection interest.
[A.] then filed a revision petition against judgment 2C_95/2023, claiming that the Federal Court had not considered various significant facts and had subsequently discovered decisive evidence.
Considerations
The Federal Court examined the revision petition and came to the conclusion that the revision of a Federal Court decision is only possible under certain conditions. A repeated review of the dispute underlying a Federal Court judgment is fundamentally excluded, unless one of the revision grounds listed in Arts. 121 ff. FSCA is present.
The Federal Court investigated the revision grounds claimed by [A.] and came to the conclusion that none of these grounds are present. In particular, it was found that the facts described by [A.] as significant had no impact on the grounds for not…